Firm News & Legal Alerts

Friday, September 7, 2012

Ziad Akl, M.D. Case Revisited

Recently, on September 7, 2012, the United States District Court, for the District of Columbia, revisited the issue in a case filed by plaintiff, Ziad Akl, M.D., who argued that the summary suspension of his hospital privileges was motivated by malice and bad faith, and therefore the resulting Adverse Action Report should either be voided or amended. (Case No: 08-0461).  In Akl, the Court dismissed the action, finding that the plaintiff failed to meet his burden of proof in showing the inaccuracy of the NPDB reports at issue.  Nevertheless, the Court re-affirmed the Doe Court’s general holding that the Act does provide a viable legal theory to challenge the factual accuracy of an Adverse Action Report, where the internal review processes contained in the NPDB regulations have been unsuccessfully exhausted.


Archived Posts

2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010



© 2019 Weiss Zarett Brofman Sonnenklar & Levy, P.C. | Disclaimer
3333 New Hyde Park Road, #211, New Hyde Park, NY 11042
| Phone: 516.627.7000

Healthcare Law | Business Law | Attorneys | Publications | Contact Us

Law Firm Website Design by
Amicus Creative