These days, more and more companies are requiring their employees to sign restrictive covenant agreements. These are agreements that are designed to protect a business’s legitimate interests and assets from being misappropriated or improperly utilized by a former employee. Such agreements often contain non-competition provisions, which may provide that an employee is prohibited from working with a competitor of the employer or starting a competitive business during employment and for a period after his or her employment ends.
Non-compete restrictions are common in the context of physician employment contracts, which are discussed here: https://weisszarett.com/2020/06/01/understanding-physician-employment-contracts-3/. In addition, in recent years, the NYS Attorney General’s office has investigated suspected misuse of noncompetes for rank-and-file employees, and has reached agreements with employers to stop using non-competes for employees who do not have access to trade secrets or confidential information.
New York resident individuals who have signed non-compete agreements and are transitioning between employers or starting a new business venture must analyze the extent of the applicable non-compete restrictions and whether such restrictions may be enforceable under New York law. In addition, the prospective employers or business partners of such individuals must be equally diligent regarding those non-compete restrictions.
New York courts have noted that there are powerful public policies weighing against depriving people of their ability to earn a living, but have also held that non-competition agreements are enforceable so long as they meet an overriding limitation of reasonableness. For a non-compete restriction to be deemed reasonable under New York law, it must meet each of the following three conditions:
1. The restriction is required for the protection of the legitimate interest of the employer;
2. The restriction does not impose undue hardship on the employee;
3. The restriction is reasonable in time period and geographic scope; and
3. The restriction is not injurious to the public.
In addition to the above items, former employers seeking to enforce a non-compete agreement will need to evidence that the employee was given consideration, i.e., something of value, in exchange for agreeing to the non-compete restriction. Examples of consideration include new employment, a promotion, garden leave payments, a raise or any form of bonus compensation. Continuing employment (“sign this or you’re fired”) is also valid form of consideration for at-will employees. The value of consideration given to the employee will influence any determination of the reasonableness of the non-compete restriction.
In that regard, an additional critical issue is the skill set of the employee. New York courts will generally uphold a non-compete restriction against a former employee whose services are “unique or extraordinary”. To meet that standard, it would need to be shown that the services are irreplaceable or that the loss of services would cause irreparable injury to the employer.
Geography, duration and scope are important factors for establishing the reasonableness of the non-compete restriction. None of those factors, however, should be reviewed independently. For example, a New York court upheld an unlimited non-compete restriction in a case where the restraint was limited to only a small geographic area. The scope of the restriction, however, generally cannot be overbroad, such as the restricting of employment in an entire major industry without regard to the specific type of services provided by the individual.
Employees in transition, along with their future prospective employers or business partners, should carefully assess any applicable non-compete agreements with a qualified attorney to minimize or avoid any potential liability. Each situation is unique and will merit its own considerations in evaluating the reasonableness of the non-compete restriction.
Weiss Zarett provides legal counsel and solutions to businesses and individuals for a broad variety of corporate law and employment law matters. If you need guidance with a matter concerning a current or prospective non-compete agreement, please email Mauro Viskovic, Esq. at email@example.com or call us at (516) 627-7000.
Weiss Zarett Brofman Sonnenklar & Levy, P.C. is a Long Island law firm providing a wide array of legal services to the members of the health care and financial services industries, including corporate and transactional matters, employment, civil and administrative litigation, regulatory issues, bankruptcy and creditors’ rights, and commercial real estate transactions.
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING: PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE FUTURE OUTCOMES.